You couldn't respec at all, and had that talent tree that is overused nowadays by every second game. Even though you could bind your spells and abilities and change them, you barely needed to do so, most of the people were using like 1-3 abilities and were doing perfectly fine with them. Sorry, but Diablo 2 had very little variations in it, mostly going for one build. That is just your opinion, right now it is better than Diablo 2 from my point of view. If it has a bad ending, can't be on D2 level Yeah the Act V ending was bad, I didn't think that they would've done it better either. From what I read on a spanish forum, the expansion is a great addition, but not on the level of a Diablo 2 sequel is expected to be.because that would be a lot.Īnd if you say that you didn't play D2 that much To bad the first Diablo 3 wasn't this good. This is all coming from a guy who never was a hardcore fan of hack & slash games, I played Diablo 2 up to 30-40 and couldn't stand it anymore, same happened with Diablo 3, but this time it is different. I am enjoying it a lot, playing with friends in adventure mode etc. But now, to be honest, it is the true sequel of Diablo 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |